Skip to content
VedicSpaceVedhaśālā

Maṅgala Doṣa · Kuja DoṣaIs your Maṅgal doṣa cancelled? मङ्गल दोष

The placement is classical; the label “Manglik” is not — it reaches our library only through a modern translator. The verse itself (BPHS 80.48) names five houses and one condition. We check exactly that — from the Lagna and from the Moon — and give you the true verdict with its source. No single-lens scare, no pūjā we invented to sell you. Enter a birth to check.

Place of birth

The demo is a real published nativity — 10 Oct 1987, 10:20, Bettiah — computed live by the same engines, not a mock-up.

We searched our own texts

“Maṅglik / Kuja doṣa” does not appear in the Bṛhat Parāśara Horā Śāstra we publish — not once, across all 3,741 corpus entries and 10 spellings.

Entries searched
3,741
Spellings tried
10
Occurrences found
0

Every spelling we tried: Manglik · Mangalik · Mangal Dosha · Mangala Dosa · Kuja Dosha · Kuja Dosa · Bhauma Dosha · मांगलिक · मंगल दोष · कुज दोष

The same search, run the same way, finds Ashtakavarga 79 times. So it is not blind — it simply did not find this.

The label is not classical; the rule is. The word itself reaches our library only twice, both times through a modern translator’s note. But Adhyāya 80 of the Bṛhat Parāśara Horā Śāstra — the chapter on a woman’s nativity — names Mars (Kuja) and the houses in śloka 48, and śloka 49 reckons them from the Moon. That is the rule this page applies: five houses, and only when no benefic joins or aspects Mars. The 2nd house and a Venus reference, common in popular rules, are not in the verse.

What the corpus holdsLibrary: 73 files, 27 distinct works (22 classical).

About this page

Check if you're really Manglik — Mars read from the Lagna and the Moon by the rule in BPHS 80.48, with its benefic exception applied and the source named.

How is Mangal dosha checked properly?
The rule is in the Bṛhat Parāśara Horā Śāstra, Adhyāya 80 (the chapter on a woman's nativity), śloka 48: Mars in the 1st, 4th, 7th, 8th or 12th house harms the husband — unless it is joined with or aspected by benefics. Śloka 49 counts the same houses from the Moon and carries the yoga to the bridegroom's chart. VedicSpace checks exactly that, from the Lagna and from the Moon. The 2nd house and a Venus reference, common in popular rules, are not in the verse; Venus is shown for information only and never counts.
Can Mangal dosha be cancelled?
Yes, in the ways the text itself gives. First, the verse's own condition: if a benefic joins or aspects Mars, there is no dosha at all. Second, BPHS 80.50: when the same yoga is present in both charts it is called auspicious — each cancels the other. VedicSpace also notes the later-tradition softening when Mars is in its own or exalted sign, labelled as later tradition. If the chart is clear it says so plainly.
Must someone with Mangal dosha marry only after 28?
Not according to the verse. BPHS 80.48 names no age, and we found no classical source in our library for an age-28 rule. The verse speaks of widowhood in a woman's chart; the next verses carry the same yoga to the groom's chart and to matching. VedicSpace therefore attaches no age and no compulsory remedy to the result.